Introduction: Investment Comparison of VELVET vs HBAR
In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between VELVET and HBAR has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positioning in crypto assets.
VELVET (VELVET): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition for its DeFAI Operating System streamlining onchain research, trading & portfolio management.
HBAR (HBAR): Since its inception, it has been hailed as a fast, secure, and fair public ledger network, and is one of the cryptocurrencies with high global trading volume and market capitalization.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between VELVET and HBAR, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question most concerned by investors:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
VELVET and HBAR Historical Price Trends
- 2025: VELVET reached its all-time high of $0.32332 on September 23, 2025.
- 2021: HBAR hit its all-time high of $0.569229 on September 15, 2021.
- Comparative analysis: In recent market cycles, VELVET dropped from its high of $0.32332 to a low of $0.037, while HBAR fell from $0.569229 to its current price.
Current Market Situation (2025-10-24)
- VELVET current price: $0.20413
- HBAR current price: $0.16477
- 24-hour trading volume: VELVET $181,559.08 vs HBAR $6,439,175.08
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 27 (Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

II. Core Factors Affecting VELVET vs HBAR Investment Value
Supply Mechanism Comparison (Tokenomics)
- VELVET: Integration of DeFi and AI technology for asset management
- HBAR: Operates on the Hedera Hashgraph network with focus on transaction speed and low costs
- 📌 Historical Pattern: Supply mechanisms drive price cycles based on technological innovation and market adoption.
Institutional Adoption and Market Applications
- Institutional Holdings: Market data insufficient to determine institutional preference
- Enterprise Adoption: VELVET focuses on AI-powered trading and asset management platforms, while HBAR emphasizes high-speed transaction capabilities
- Regulatory Attitudes: Regulatory frameworks for both tokens are still evolving globally
Technical Development and Ecosystem Building
- VELVET Technical Upgrades: Advancing DeFi and AI integration for trading platforms
- HBAR Technical Development: Improving Hedera Hashgraph network efficiency and transaction processing
- Ecosystem Comparison: VELVET is building in the DeFi/AI intersection space while HBAR focuses on enterprise blockchain applications
Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles
- Performance During Inflation: Insufficient historical data for comprehensive analysis
- Monetary Policy Effects: Both tokens subject to broader cryptocurrency market trends influenced by monetary policies
- Geopolitical Factors: Cross-border transaction demand potentially benefits both platforms in different use cases
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: VELVET vs HBAR
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- VELVET: Conservative $0.133848 - $0.2028 | Optimistic $0.2028 - $0.269724
- HBAR: Conservative $0.1468411 - $0.16499 | Optimistic $0.16499 - $0.230986
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- VELVET may enter a growth phase, with estimated price range $0.2738630973 - $0.3049197372
- HBAR may enter a steady growth phase, with estimated price range $0.1688045688 - $0.291388839
- Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETF, ecosystem development
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- VELVET: Base scenario $0.3514708170792 - $0.365529649762368 | Optimistic scenario $0.365529649762368+
- HBAR: Base scenario $0.31965606835575 - $0.412356328178917 | Optimistic scenario $0.412356328178917+
View detailed price predictions for VELVET and HBAR
Disclaimer: This analysis is based on historical data and market trends. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and unpredictable. This information should not be considered as financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.
VELVET:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
0.269724 |
0.2028 |
0.133848 |
0 |
| 2026 |
0.32840418 |
0.236262 |
0.21972366 |
15 |
| 2027 |
0.3049197372 |
0.28233309 |
0.2738630973 |
38 |
| 2028 |
0.375841809408 |
0.2936264136 |
0.237837395016 |
43 |
| 2029 |
0.3682075226544 |
0.334734111504 |
0.27782931254832 |
63 |
| 2030 |
0.365529649762368 |
0.3514708170792 |
0.270632529150984 |
72 |
HBAR:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
0.230986 |
0.16499 |
0.1468411 |
0 |
| 2026 |
0.20392764 |
0.197988 |
0.11681292 |
20 |
| 2027 |
0.291388839 |
0.20095782 |
0.1688045688 |
21 |
| 2028 |
0.356951327775 |
0.2461733295 |
0.19201519701 |
49 |
| 2029 |
0.337749808074 |
0.3015623286375 |
0.202046760187125 |
83 |
| 2030 |
0.412356328178917 |
0.31965606835575 |
0.201383323064122 |
94 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: VELVET vs HBAR
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategy
- VELVET: Suitable for investors interested in DeFi and AI integration potential
- HBAR: Suitable for investors looking for enterprise blockchain adoption and transaction efficiency
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: VELVET 30% vs HBAR 70%
- Aggressive investors: VELVET 60% vs HBAR 40%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risk
- VELVET: Higher volatility due to newer market entry and smaller market cap
- HBAR: Susceptible to overall crypto market trends and enterprise adoption rates
Technical Risk
- VELVET: Scalability, network stability in DeFi/AI integration
- HBAR: Network congestion, potential security vulnerabilities
Regulatory Risk
- Global regulatory policies may impact both differently, with HBAR potentially facing more scrutiny due to its enterprise focus
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- VELVET advantages: Innovative DeFi and AI integration, potential for high growth in emerging tech sectors
- HBAR advantages: Established enterprise adoption, focus on transaction efficiency and low costs
✅ Investment Advice:
- New investors: Consider a balanced approach with a slight preference for HBAR due to its more established market presence
- Experienced investors: Explore a higher allocation to VELVET for potential higher returns, while maintaining HBAR for stability
- Institutional investors: Evaluate HBAR for enterprise blockchain applications and VELVET for innovative DeFi/AI solutions
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the main differences between VELVET and HBAR?
A: VELVET focuses on integrating DeFi and AI technology for asset management, while HBAR operates on the Hedera Hashgraph network, emphasizing transaction speed and low costs. VELVET is newer and targets the DeFi/AI intersection, whereas HBAR has a more established presence in enterprise blockchain applications.
Q2: Which cryptocurrency has shown better price performance recently?
A: As of October 24, 2025, VELVET is trading at $0.20413, while HBAR is at $0.16477. VELVET reached its all-time high of $0.32332 on September 23, 2025, whereas HBAR's all-time high was $0.569229 on September 15, 2021. VELVET has shown stronger recent performance, but historical data is limited.
Q3: How do the future price predictions compare for VELVET and HBAR?
A: For 2030, VELVET's base scenario predicts a range of $0.3514708170792 - $0.365529649762368, while HBAR's base scenario predicts $0.31965606835575 - $0.412356328178917. Both have potential for growth, with HBAR showing a slightly higher upper range in long-term predictions.
Q4: What are the key factors affecting the investment value of VELVET and HBAR?
A: Key factors include supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technical development, ecosystem building, and macroeconomic factors. VELVET's value is influenced by advancements in DeFi and AI integration, while HBAR's value is affected by enterprise adoption rates and improvements in the Hedera Hashgraph network.
Q5: How should investors allocate their assets between VELVET and HBAR?
A: Conservative investors might consider allocating 30% to VELVET and 70% to HBAR, while aggressive investors could allocate 60% to VELVET and 40% to HBAR. The specific allocation should depend on individual risk tolerance and investment goals.
Q6: What are the main risks associated with investing in VELVET and HBAR?
A: Both face market risks tied to overall crypto trends. VELVET may have higher volatility due to its newer market entry and smaller market cap. HBAR faces risks related to enterprise adoption rates. Technical risks include scalability issues for VELVET and potential network congestion for HBAR. Both are subject to evolving regulatory risks.