Introduction: INC vs BTC Investment Comparison
In the cryptocurrency market, WorldAssets (INC) vs Bitcoin (BTC) comparison is an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only differ significantly in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positioning in the crypto asset space.
WorldAssets (INC): Launched in 2025, it has gained market recognition for its focus on revolutionizing real-world asset (RWA) finance through blockchain and DeFi technologies.
Bitcoin (BTC): Since its inception in 2008, it has been hailed as "digital gold" and remains the cryptocurrency with the highest global trading volume and market capitalization.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between INC and BTC, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question most concerning to investors:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
WorldAssets (INC) and Bitcoin (BTC) Historical Price Trends
- 2025: INC reached its all-time high of $1.3068 on September 30, 2025.
- 2025: BTC hit a new record high of $126,080 on October 7, 2025.
- Comparative analysis: In the current market cycle, INC has fallen from its peak of $1.3068 to a low of $0.05, while BTC has shown more resilience, maintaining a price above $100,000.
Current Market Situation (2025-10-24)
- INC current price: $0.5027
- BTC current price: $110,237.1
- 24-hour trading volume: INC $54,509.85 vs BTC $1,202,439,951.95
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 30 (Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

Bitcoin Investment Value Analysis: Core Factors
I. Influence of Core Factors on BTC Investment Value
Supply Mechanism (Tokenomics)
- Bitcoin: Fixed supply cap of 21 million coins, creating strong scarcity similar to precious metals
- Halving Mechanism: Programmed reduction in mining rewards increases scarcity over time, supporting long-term price appreciation
- 📌 Historical Pattern: The fixed supply and halving events have historically created cyclical price movements
Institutional Adoption and Market Application
- Institutional Holdings: Growing acceptance as "digital gold" with highest market capitalization and widest market acceptance
- Enterprise Adoption: Primarily used for value storage and cross-border payments
- Regulatory Landscape: ETF approvals have simplified access, while regulatory developments continue to influence demand
Technical Development and Ecosystem
- Bitcoin Technology: Built on blockchain with Proof of Work (PoW) consensus, designed for security and simplicity
- Transaction Data: Stored on distributed ledger ensuring transparency, tamper resistance, and censorship resistance
- Use Cases: Primarily functions as a store of value and cross-border payment system
Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles
- Inflation Protection: Limited supply provides anti-inflationary properties, positioning Bitcoin as a potential hedge
- Market Sentiment: Positive news about commercial applications or favorable regulations drives demand
- Risk Factors: Extremely high volatility, as evidenced by major drawdowns in 2018 (ICO bubble burst) and 2022 (interest rate hikes, inflation pressure, and crypto institution collapses like LUNA and FTX)
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: INC vs BTC
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- INC: Conservative $0.38-$0.50 | Optimistic $0.50-$0.56
- BTC: Conservative $97,000-$110,000 | Optimistic $110,000-$160,000
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- INC may enter a growth phase, with expected prices ranging from $0.33 to $0.83
- BTC may enter a bull market, with expected prices ranging from $159,000 to $241,000
- Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETF, ecosystem development
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- INC: Base scenario $0.49-$0.88 | Optimistic scenario $0.88-$1.20
- BTC: Base scenario $205,000-$250,000 | Optimistic scenario $250,000-$343,000
View detailed price predictions for INC and BTC
Disclaimer
INC:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
0.558432 |
0.4986 |
0.378936 |
0 |
| 2026 |
0.5813676 |
0.528516 |
0.31182444 |
5 |
| 2027 |
0.826863282 |
0.5549418 |
0.327415662 |
10 |
| 2028 |
0.95344550658 |
0.690902541 |
0.38690542296 |
37 |
| 2029 |
0.9290566468827 |
0.82217402379 |
0.4275304923708 |
63 |
| 2030 |
1.199593009410799 |
0.87561533533635 |
0.490344587788356 |
74 |
BTC:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
159913.83 |
110285.4 |
97051.152 |
0 |
| 2026 |
193192.44945 |
135099.615 |
101324.71125 |
22 |
| 2027 |
241294.66737075 |
164146.032225 |
159221.65125825 |
48 |
| 2028 |
265563.65823521625 |
202720.349797875 |
158121.8728423425 |
83 |
| 2029 |
266921.8845788620125 |
234142.004016545625 |
175606.50301240921875 |
112 |
| 2030 |
343228.763687854231687 |
250531.94429770381875 |
205436.194324117131375 |
127 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: INC vs BTC
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategy
- INC: Suitable for investors focusing on real-world asset (RWA) finance and DeFi potential
- BTC: Suitable for investors seeking stability and inflation-hedge properties
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: INC: 10% vs BTC: 90%
- Aggressive investors: INC: 30% vs BTC: 70%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risk
- INC: Higher volatility, less market liquidity
- BTC: Susceptible to macroeconomic factors, regulatory news
Technical Risk
- INC: Scalability, network stability
- BTC: Mining centralization, potential security vulnerabilities
Regulatory Risk
- Global regulatory policies may impact both differently, with BTC potentially facing more scrutiny due to its larger market presence
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- INC advantages: Focus on RWA finance, potential for growth in DeFi sector
- BTC advantages: Established market leader, stronger institutional adoption, proven track record
✅ Investment Advice:
- Novice investors: Consider allocating a larger portion to BTC for stability
- Experienced investors: Diversify between BTC and INC based on risk tolerance
- Institutional investors: Focus on BTC for its established market position and liquidity
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the key differences between WorldAssets (INC) and Bitcoin (BTC)?
A: WorldAssets (INC) focuses on real-world asset (RWA) finance and DeFi, while Bitcoin (BTC) is primarily seen as "digital gold" and a store of value. INC is newer and potentially more volatile, while BTC has a longer track record and wider institutional adoption.
Q2: Which has performed better historically, INC or BTC?
A: Bitcoin has shown more resilience in the current market cycle. While INC reached its all-time high of $1.3068 in September 2025, it has since fallen significantly. BTC, on the other hand, has maintained a price above $100,000 after reaching its peak of $126,080 in October 2025.
Q3: How do the supply mechanisms of INC and BTC differ?
A: Bitcoin has a fixed supply cap of 21 million coins and a halving mechanism that reduces mining rewards over time, creating scarcity. The supply mechanism for INC is not specified in the given information.
Q4: What are the price predictions for INC and BTC by 2030?
A: For INC, the base scenario predicts $0.49-$0.88, with an optimistic scenario of $0.88-$1.20. For BTC, the base scenario predicts $205,000-$250,000, with an optimistic scenario of $250,000-$343,000.
Q5: How should investors allocate their portfolio between INC and BTC?
A: Conservative investors might consider allocating 10% to INC and 90% to BTC, while more aggressive investors might opt for 30% INC and 70% BTC. The exact allocation should be based on individual risk tolerance and investment goals.
Q6: What are the main risks associated with investing in INC and BTC?
A: Both face market risks, with INC potentially having higher volatility and less liquidity. Technical risks include scalability for INC and mining centralization for BTC. Both also face regulatory risks, with BTC potentially facing more scrutiny due to its larger market presence.
Q7: Which is considered the better buy for different types of investors?
A: Novice investors might consider allocating more to BTC for stability. Experienced investors could diversify between BTC and INC based on risk tolerance. Institutional investors may focus on BTC due to its established market position and liquidity.